> ## Content Index > Fetch the complete content index at: https://learn.tsunammi.io/llms.txt > Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further. # The 5-Preset Dashboard That Can Replace a $50,000 Market-Making Setup - URL: https://learn.tsunammi.io/the-5-preset-dashboard-that-can-replace-a-50-000-market-making-setup/ - Published: 2026-09-24T18:59:28.000Z - Updated: 2026-09-24T18:59:28.000Z - Author: Tsunammi Team > Here's what replaced them: Wallet Pools, Initial Buyback Launch, TWAP, Stealth Distribution, and Stealth Accumulation - five presets that already run on one dashboard. --- You were told that launching without a market-making desk is suicide. That snipers will eat your first block, bots will drain your liquidity, and within an hour your chart will look like a seismograph during an earthquake unless someone with a retainer and a Bloomberg terminal is quietly propping up your bid.Here is the uncomfortable truth. A market maker is not magic. It is a small set of mechanical rules - how you coordinate wallets, how you time your own launch buys, how you slice a big order, how you sell without crashing your own chart, and how you quietly defend price with a reserve. Every one of those rules is already built into a preset. The $50,000-a-month desk is mostly just charging you to run five things that already exist as buttons in [Tsunammi](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io).I want to show you those five presets. Each one is a button, not a project. Put together, they replace the actual function of a paid MM desk during the only period that matters - the first 72 hours, when your chart either survives contact with bots and insiders or it doesn't.By the end you will see the exact operating logic a launch's in-house MM quietly runs - not their capital, not their contacts, just their tooling. Which, it turns out, is tooling you already have access to. > **You've seen this happen.** A promising launch, a green candle, a Telegram full of rocket emojis - then one wallet buys the floor and dumps thirty seconds later while everyone watches. The chat goes quiet, then someone types "is this a rug?", then people start asking for refunds you never promised. You didn't do anything wrong. You just didn't know what a market maker actually does - and neither did most of the other founders who got picked apart the same week. --- ### 1\. Wallet Pools > \> Coverage = Wallets per Pool × Parallel Campaigns, run by one operator from one dashboard A market-making desk's real product isn't intuition, it's headcount. A handful of traders each manually running a handful of wallets, watching the chart, placing orders by hand, coordinating in a group chat so nobody accidentally buys against their own colleague's sell. Wallet Pools collapses that org chart into one interface: you define a pool of wallets, fund them through anonymous top-ups so there's no on-chain trail linking them back to you or to each other, and one campaign coordinates all of them at once - buying, selling, or holding to whatever preset you've set, without two wallets in the pool ever working against each other.**Concrete example.** A small MM desk staffs a launch with three traders, each manually running eight to ten wallets across a shift - roughly 25–30 wallets of real coverage, and that's before anyone gets tired or logs off for the night. A Wallet Pools campaign run by one person coordinates a pool of 1,000 wallets from a single dashboard, each funded through anonymous top-ups so there's no on-chain trail linking them back to one CEX withdrawal or to each other. Same coordination logic, more than 30 times the wallet coverage, zero shift changes. [![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS1NZg8XIAAk8-D.jpg)](https://x.com/tsunammitools/article/2102430678994362832/media/2102421701787066368?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) **What changes once you use it:** your chart stops being watched by three tired people in a group chat and starts being run by one policy, applied consistently, across a pool that never needs a break.**Why most teams still don't do this:** founders default to "find a market maker to trust" because that's the only mental model they've been given. Nobody tells them the actual leverage a desk sells is coordination tooling - and that tooling is now something one person can run alone. > **Do this now.** Before your next launch, build your Wallet Pool and fund it through anonymous top-ups - at least 24 hours out, not while your community is already watching the contract address. --- ### 2\. Initial Buyback Launch > \> Sniper Edge ≈ (Slots between token creation and your own first buy) × (bot latency advantage per slot) - collapses to 0 when both land in the same block Every sniper bot is really just exploiting one number: the time between your token existing and your own buy pressure landing. Call it the sniper window. On Solana, slots land roughly every 400ms. A "careless" launch - token created, then a few seconds pass while the team tweets the contract address - opens a window of 10–15 slots. That's enough time for three to five competing bots to each land a buy at the floor price before a single human has clicked "buy."[Tsunammi's](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) Initial Buyback Launch is built directly into its pump.fun launch flow: when you launch through [Tsunammi](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io), the token's creation transaction and your own buy transaction are bundled together so they land in the same block. There is no gap between "the token exists" and "you already hold supply" for a bot's latency edge to exploit.**Concrete example.** Without it: the token goes live on the bonding curve, and there's a gap - even a few seconds - before your own buy lands. Three sniper bots each grab supply off the curve at the rock-bottom starting price, dump into the first real buy pressure your launch generates, and your chart prints red before your community has finished reading the announcement. With Initial Buyback Launch: creation and your own buy land in the same block. The first buyer on the curve is you, not a bot, because there was never a gap for one to sit in. [![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS1NdglWkAA6LTf.jpg)](https://x.com/tsunammitools/article/2102430678994362832/media/2102421770410037248?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) **What changes once you use it:** the first buyers on your chart are people who actually believe in the project, not bots renting your floor price for thirty seconds.**Why most teams still don't do this:** most pump.fun launches go straight through the public UI, which has no bundling option at all - the token goes live and buys land whenever they land. That's exactly the gap Initial Buyback Launch is built to close. > **Do this now.** Launch your token on pump.fun through [Tsunammi](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) with Initial Buyback Launch turned on, so your own buy is bundled into the same block as creation. Don't launch through the public UI and hope you're fast enough. --- ### 3\. TWAP > \> Price Impact % ≈ 2 × (Slice Size ÷ Reserve Depth), sliced across N intervals of 30–120s each, at low priority fee This is the same price-impact math that decides every candle on your chart. A trade that's 1% of one side of your pool moves price by roughly 2%. Fire your entire order in one transaction and you pay that impact once, on the full amount. [Tsunammi's](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) TWAP preset instead breaks a target buy into many smaller slices spread over a chosen window - typically 30–120 seconds - so each slice only ever meets a small fraction of the pool at once, and the pool has time to partially refill between clips from ordinary market flow.**Concrete example.** A $6,000 buy fired in one shot against a $30,000-per-side pool: impact ≈ 2 × (6,000 ÷ 30,000) = 40%. The same $6,000 run through TWAP as twelve $500 slices: each slice impact ≈ 2 × (500 ÷ 30,000) ≈ 3.3%, and because slices land roughly 10–15 seconds apart, part of that impact reverts between clips from normal trading - landing you close to TWAP's own target range of a few percent average move, not a 40% candle. [![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS1N3RvW0AAHfhA.jpg)](https://x.com/tsunammitools/article/2102430678994362832/media/2102422213102063616?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) **What changes once you use it:** you stop choosing between "buy it all now" and "don't buy at all." You get the size you wanted at close to the price you wanted, without ever printing the candle that tips off every bot watching the pair.**Why most teams still don't do this:** most teams either buy in one shot because it's simple, or manually split orders by hand and get the timing wrong - too fast to matter, or too slow to finish before the moment they cared about has passed. > **Do this now.** Next time you need to add size to your own chart, don't fire it in one transaction. Load TWAP, set the window to 60–90 seconds, and let the pool breathe between clips. --- ### 4\. Stealth Distribution > \> Safe Daily Unlock ≤ k × (Trailing 7-Day Avg Volume), k ≈ 0.10–0.20 - enforced by Stealth Distribution: tiny clips, 60–300s pauses This is the equation that kills more charts a month after launch than any sniper bot kills in the first hour. If your trailing week is averaging $50,000 a day in organic volume, the market can absorb roughly $5,000–$10,000 of new sell-side supply per day without the chart falling out of bed. Anything beyond that isn't a "correction," it's a mechanical certainty.[Tsunammi's](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) Stealth Distribution preset is the mirror of Stealth Accumulation, built for exactly this: a large total size, broken into tiny per-transaction clips, with long randomized pauses - 60 to 300 seconds - between them. To anyone watching the chart or the wallet, it reads as ordinary background sell pressure. Nothing about it looks like one address unwinding a position.**Concrete example.** Team allocation is 15% of supply, worth $300,000 at launch price. Cliff-unlocked on day 30 in one shot against $50,000/day of volume, that's six days' worth of total market liquidity hitting the book in a single moment - an 80–90% drawdown isn't bad luck, it's arithmetic. Route the same $300,000 through Stealth Distribution instead: tiny clips, 60–300 second pauses, spread widely enough that daily sell pressure stays inside the market's roughly $5,000–$10,000 absorption band instead of blowing through it in a single afternoon. [![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS1OIMxXQAA3l7A.jpg)](https://x.com/tsunammitools/article/2102430678994362832/media/2102422503826079744?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) **What changes once you use it:** vesting stops being a "trust me" marketing line and becomes a Stealth Distribution schedule you can point to, sized off your own volume data instead of a template copy-pasted from another project's tokenomics deck.**Why most teams still don't do this:** unlock schedules get set once, at deployment, months before anyone knows what real trading volume will look like - and nobody goes back to route the actual sell-off through a preset built to match it. > **Do this now.** Before you unlock a single insider allocation, check your trailing 7-day volume and route the sell-off through Stealth Distribution at a rate under 20% of it. If the math doesn't work, don't unlock yet. --- ### 5\. Stealth Accumulation > \> Defense Reserve = r × Raised Liquidity, r ≈ 0.10–0.20 - deployed via Stealth Accumulation: tiny clips, 60–300s pauses, at preset levels This is the one piece an MM desk genuinely does that isn't just configuration - active inventory management, buying dips and selling rips to hold a range. [Tsunammi's](https://tsunammi.io/?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) Stealth Accumulation preset runs this without needing $50,000 a month or a person watching the chart at 3am: a defense budget, broken into tiny per-transaction clips with long randomized pauses, buying quietly at whatever levels you set. To the market it looks like patient accumulation, not panic-buying a falling chart.**Concrete example.** You raise $100,000 in liquidity. Hold back $15,000 (15%) as a defense reserve, split roughly 50/50 between SOL and token. Pre-set support levels at −20%, −35%, and −50% from launch price, and let Stealth Accumulation deploy $500–$1,000 clips at each level rather than one panicked lump-sum buy. On the way up, sell small clips into resistance spikes to recycle profit back into the reserve rather than letting the treasury sit static. You are not trying to run continuous two-sided quotes like a professional desk - you only need to defend a handful of levels during the specific 72-hour window when the chart is most fragile and thinnest. [![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS1OdHsXoAA3igA.jpg)](https://x.com/tsunammitools/article/2102430678994362832/media/2102422863240208384?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) **What changes once you use it:** "we'll figure out support if it dumps" becomes a Stealth Accumulation campaign, pre-configured with a known budget, instead of an emotional decision made in a Telegram call at 3am.**Why most teams still don't do this:** it requires holding back capital at launch instead of deploying all of it into initial liquidity or marketing, and most founders don't want to be the ones explaining to their community why 15% of the raise is sitting in reserve instead of "in the pool." > **Do this now.** Set your three defense levels and fund the reserve before launch, not after the first red candle. Stealth Accumulation only works if the budget is already sitting there when the dip happens. --- ### Putting the five presets together Each preset on its own is a button. Together, they are the entire operating function of a market-making desk, minus the invoice. [![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HS1OwzdWsAAv-Ld.jpg)](https://x.com/tsunammitools/article/2102430678994362832/media/2102423201405906944?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) Five presets. None of them require a desk, a retainer, or a stranger holding your private keys. All five run from the same dashboard you already use to launch. --- ### The incentives you're not being told about The launch ecosystem does not particularly want founders to know this. Agencies sell "anti-snipe protection" and "careful order execution" as proprietary edge, when they're frequently just Initial Buyback Launch and TWAP running under a different name. MM desks quote $50,000 retainers to "manage your chart" when a meaningful share of that fee is buying Wallet Pools and Stealth Accumulation - coordination and inventory defense - dressed up as bespoke expertise.Worse, some of the same actors selling snipe protection are adjacent to the sniping infrastructure itself - the fear of getting dumped on is what sells the service, so there's a quiet incentive for that fear to stay justified. A founder who doesn't know the underlying mechanics has no way to audit whether the $50K retainer is doing anything a well-configured preset stack wouldn't have done for a fraction of the price.This isn't a conspiracy. It's a market where the buyer can't price the product, because the buyer was never handed the presets. > ***The founders who keep control of their chart never outspent anyone. They just knew five buttons existed before the snipers did.*** [](https://x.com/tsunammitools/status/2102430678994362832?ref=learn.tsunammi.io) ##